I think it is to late to block entering illegal characters into a log because illegal characters are already logged. At least I hope that is what robertlipe is refering to. don't alow illegal characters to be typed into to a log entry. robertlipe is talking about inputing to a log entry ie. I think gopman uses "inputs" to refer to the inputs to the GPX user programs. OK, I hope you guys are talking about two totally different "inputs".
That said, I'm not the one doing the work, so I don't much care where (or how) it's fixed. A log is entered once, but may appear on web pages and GPX files for months spend the clock cycles to catch it at the point of violation.
Gpsbabel invalid return data at line 3 code#
I'm speculating that's probably two different sets of code that spills those, so that's at least two bases of code that would have to do this. In this very discussion, we've seen that there is illegal output on both HTML (web page) and GPX (XML) versions of the data. Pay the cost of scanning, filtering, fixing it once instead of many times. Data will be input once and output many times. That's much safer than assuming that all of the input methods will catch the problem. needs to fix their GPX output routines to catch this sort of problem. gpsbabel - GPS route and waypoint data converter DESCRIPTION GPSBabel Version 1.5.4. I'll let you start the bidding with your favorite admin. In working with guys on similar issues, it was a stated goal to generate output that validated successfully, so I suspect there will be little debate that there is breakage. Even with this, the degrees of rightness range from editing this specific log to trapping this on generation of HTML and XML to trapping it on input. (Hint: as the author of one of the packages in question, I can tell you this will be a non-starter.)Ĥ) Bribe the admins of (maybe a "please" will suffice) to fix thsi problem upstream.
Gpsbabel invalid return data at line 3 software#
You get docked karma points if you post multiple notes or no-finds to this cache just to make this one scroll away.ģ) Lobby all the authors of GPX-reading software to handle illegal input.
This solves the problem for anyone creating a GPX file with this specific cache until there are four more logs to bump this log or the number of logs is raised. This solves the problem for you for this specific run.Ģ) Get the poster of the log in question to edit the log in question. There are three solutions, each with a different degree of moral purity:ġ) Edit the character in question of the GPX file you're trying to process and move on. It appears that below 0x1f, the only values allowed are the whitespace brothers - 0x09, 0x0a, and 0x0d (tab/cr/nl) I'm not an XML jock, so I can't tell if any pertinent standards prohibit this, but emprically, The character in question is indeed the one before "sorry" which appears to attempt to be an entity encoding but is "" It hurls:įatal Error at file /tmp/6659.gpx, line 36, char 134 So I created a tiny little pocket query that contained the cache in question. Since I'm on the developers list for GPX, I know the answer to this will be "what does saxcount say about the file?" When the GPX spec itself is vague, the answer always defers to what the validating parser SAXCount votes.
0 kommentar(er)
